Skip to content

Change alt to match in filenames.#6773

Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:incomingfrom
lkuper:alt-to-match
May 28, 2013
Merged

Change alt to match in filenames.#6773
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:incomingfrom
lkuper:alt-to-match

Conversation

@lkuper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lkuper lkuper commented May 27, 2013

RIP alt.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2013
@bors bors closed this May 28, 2013
@bors bors merged commit 32c6199 into rust-lang:incoming May 28, 2013
@lkuper lkuper deleted the alt-to-match branch May 29, 2013 02:38
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2026
…nd `review-changes-since` functionality (#6773)

* triagebot: use the `S-waiting-on-{author,review}` label sets

And configure triagebot review status label flipping.

Instead of
`pr-{not-reviewed,waiting-on-author,follow-up-review-pending}`, for two
reasons:

1. Consistency with `rust-lang/rust`. The `S-*` status labels are the
   ones that `rust-lang/rust` uses.
2. I don't think the `not-reviewed` vs `follow-up-review-pending`
   distinction makes a lot of difference in practice. However, we can
   still keep the `pr-follow-up-review-pending` label, since that is
   previously manually applied anyway.

* triagebot: allow users to relabel `S-*` and `C-*` labels

Through `@rustbot label`.

* triagebot: enable `review-changes-since` functionality

Basically, a web-rendered version of `range-diff` to make review after
force-pushes easier.

* triagebot: enable `shortcut` functionality

This allows PR reviewers and authors to easily use:

```
@rustbot ready   # S-{waiting-on-author,blocked} -> S-waiting-on-review
@rustbot author  # S-{waiting-on-review,blocked} -> S-waiting-on-author
@rustbot blocked # S-waiting-on-{author,review}  -> S-blocked
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants