Merged
Conversation
💯 Test Coverage
😎 Tests Results
👀 Tests Details • (45%)
|
juanchoperezj
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2024
Collaborator
|
@fernandatoledo should the PR be pointed to |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this do?
Replaces mentions to obytes for Rootstrap, corresponding attribution is done at the readme, but we'll make this our own and the docs need to reflect that.
Why did you do this?
The readme still had a lot of information from the obytes original one, there are some sections that at this stage I don't think reflect Rootstrap's best interest like contribution to the template, there's still a long way to go before outsider contributors take interest on this template.
Who/what does this impact?
Documentation
How did you test this?
N / A