Make putting large objects work.#411
Conversation
|
Let's hold off on merging this due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-739. Although actually this problem may already be present in the Arrow commit in the current master. |
|
Since https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-739 was addressed by apache/arrow@ad8a0cf, can you change this patch to use the most recent arrow commit? |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
| --docker-image=$DOCKER_SHA \ | ||
| --num-nodes=5 \ | ||
| --test-script=/ray/test/jenkins_tests/multi_node_tests/test_0.py | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The problem with the tests in Jenkins may just be that we were starting the docker image with a small amount of shared memory (1GB), so maybe it would be sufficient to just increase that number.
|
Merged build finished. Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test FAILed. |
|
Test FAILed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test FAILed. |
|
Test FAILed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test FAILed. |
|
Test FAILed. |
|
Merged build finished. Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
This validates that arrow's large object support apache/arrow#455 and apache/arrow#404 is working for us end-to-end |
Co-authored-by: 黑驰 <senlin.zsl@antgroup.com>
This should address #412.