As a way to support the more unique use-cases that developers can come up with that our library doesn't support out of the box (see below for example bugs), and continue to support backward compatibility to our existing users, we'd like to return the raw response object from the API to all API calls. This will additionally provide an less intrusive way for developers to migrate their code from the generic libraries to our more idiomatic library.
Proposal for documented object name in docs: rawBody, rawResponse, response, resp, apiResponse ?
Addresses #427
Addresses #342
As a way to support the more unique use-cases that developers can come up with that our library doesn't support out of the box (see below for example bugs), and continue to support backward compatibility to our existing users, we'd like to return the raw response object from the API to all API calls. This will additionally provide an less intrusive way for developers to migrate their code from the generic libraries to our more idiomatic library.
Proposal for documented object name in docs:
rawBody,rawResponse,response,resp,apiResponse?Addresses #427
Addresses #342