Turn X/Twitter content into reusable execution playbooks.
- Ash 🌿 (OpenClaw) — architecture, content-type engine, engagement analysis, agent-browser integration
- C3 🌙 (OpenClaw) — initial implementation and packaging
- B3 (BlueBirdBack) — owner and maintainer
- Mode A — Fetch any X post and convert it into a structured playbook: thesis, engagement quality, key numbers, why it worked, content-type-aware workflow steps, and one actionable next step
- Mode B — Mine an account's recent posts for dominant patterns (async ops, domain flipping, ship-fast, memory-first, etc.) with per-pattern engagement rates and concrete upgrade suggestions
- Mode C — Explain why a specific post performed well (virality drivers, engagement rate, reply dynamics)
| Type | Example signal | Workflow template |
|---|---|---|
commerce |
"$4.99", "domain", "sold" | 5-step domain/asset flip playbook |
announcement |
"launched", "shipped", "上线" | test → compare → share |
question |
ends with ?, "why/how/what" |
hypothesis → experiment → publish |
workflow |
"step", "cron", "agent", "自动" | capture → extract → automate → review |
opinion |
default | claim → test → verdict |
Talk to your agent in plain English — no commands needed.
"What can we learn from this post? <POST_URL>""Turn this into an action playbook: <POST_URL>""Give me the core thesis, workflow steps, automation hooks, and one next step for: <POST_URL>"
Expected output: a structured markdown playbook with engagement quality score, key numbers extracted, and a content-type-aware 5-step workflow.
"Learn from @<handle>'s recent posts in the last 7 days.""Find recurring patterns from @<handle> and suggest what to add to my workflow.""Mine @<handle> for top patterns this week, then give me one action I can do today."
Expected output: dominant patterns ranked by engagement rate, evidence links, and a concrete per-pattern skill upgrade.
"Why did this post get <N> views and <M> likes? <POST_URL>""Explain the virality drivers for: <POST_URL>""What made this perform so well? <POST_URL>"
Expected output: engagement rate label (🔥 viral / ⚡ strong / 👍 normal / 📉 low), reply dynamics, format analysis, and a one-paragraph explanation.
"Is this claim verified, mostly plausible, or weak? <POST_URL>""Extract only practical steps. Skip opinions: <POST_URL>""Compare these two posts — where do they agree and disagree? <URL_A> <URL_B>""Turn this into a 7-day execution plan with daily actions: <POST_URL>""Draft a friendly X reply in Chinese for: <POST_URL>""Make a decision checklist from this post: <POST_URL>"
- Asking too broad ("analyze everything") instead of one clear task
- Not providing a specific URL or handle
- Asking for many outputs at once instead of one focused result
# Ask your agent:
"Install the x-post-playbook skill from https://github.com/BlueBirdBack/x-post-playbook-skill"Or clone manually:
git clone https://github.com/BlueBirdBack/x-post-playbook-skill \
~/.openclaw/workspace/skills/x-post-playbook
npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install --with-deps- Primary source ideas from public posts by QingYue (@YuLin807):
- Fetch dependencies:
- agent-browser by Vercel Labs (primary): https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser
- x-tweet-fetcher by ythx-101 (fallback): https://github.com/ythx-101/x-tweet-fetcher
- Reference analysis artifacts in
references/ - Huge thanks to QingYue for sharing workflows openly.